← Case study Circle Internet Group NYSE: CRCL
Anchor
$138
Action
starter only
Days to Coinbase
94
Today
2026-05-13
§ 04 · Revenue mechanics

Float × SOFR × (1 − Coinbase share).

Three numbers determine almost everything. The third — Coinbase — is the structural problem the deck is built around.

The flow

How Circle actually makes a dollar

USDC holder wires $1 earns 0% (statutory ban) Circle issues USDC $77B float BlackRock USDXX 2a-7 govt MMF ~87% of reserves custodied at BNY Mellon US T-bills + repo earns SOFR ≈ 3.5% ≤93-day duration Gross reserve income $2.6–2.8B Q1'26 annualised Coinbase 100% on-platform yield + 50% off-platform ~$1.6B/yr Other partners Binance ($60M up-front) Bybit, ecosystem ~$50–100M/yr Circle net retained $653M Q1'26 reserve income $1 invest SOFR ~54¢ of every $ residual ≈ 46% of gross Circle revenue ≈ $77B float × 3.5% SOFR × (1 − ~54% Coinbase)
In words

A formula a five-year-old can use

"Circle's annual revenue ≈ USDC float × SOFR × ~50% take rate, declining" financial.md · §Revenue Decomposition

Plug in: $77B × 3.5% × 50% ≈ $1.35B of net reserve income on the current run-rate. Q1'26 annualises to $2.6-2.8B in total revenue & reserve income (gross of distribution), which the company nets down via the $407M/qtr distribution cost line.

Why Coinbase concentration is structural, not stylistic

Three independent analysts converged on the same number: $908M of $1.01B in FY24 distribution costs went to Coinbase = 90% of partner spend = ~54¢ of every revenue dollar.

Coinbase keeps 100% of yield on USDC sitting on Coinbase plus 50% of residual everywhere else, AND has veto rights over new Circle partnerships. Coinbase's wallet share has compounded 5% → 12% → 20% → 22%+ — meaning a growing slice of the float earns Circle exactly $0.

competitor / supply-chain / customer / financial
The trajectory

Coinbase wallet share — the curve that is the thesis

30% 20% 10% 0% 2022 2023 2024 2025 5% 12% 20% 22%+ → rising Coinbase share of USDC float

The 4x in three years

The cost line grew faster than revenue during 2022-2025. When Circle wanted to bring Binance into the tent (Dec 2024), Coinbase had to agree — and reportedly traded some of its own residual share to make the deal work. Circle had to pay Binance $60.25M up-front plus monthly incentives gated on Binance holding ≥1.5B USDC.

Net read: Circle is a margin-takers' margin-taker. The reserve-yield rents are real but the gatekeepers between Circle and the float (Coinbase first, Binance second, every L1/L2 ecosystem participant after) have meaningfully more bargaining power than Circle does.

supply-chain.md · §Pass-Through Power
Rate sensitivity

Float × SOFR — Circle-retained reserve income, $M

Net of the ~50% distribution split. Other revenue / Arc not included; opex not subtracted. "The asymmetry here is telling: the bull case requires both float growth AND rate persistence; the bear case requires only one to fail."

SOFR scenario Float = $60B Float = $77B (today) Float = $120B Float = $200B
5.25% 2024 peak / "debt-spiral premium" $1,575 $2,021 $3,150 $5,250
4.0% higher-for-longer $1,200 $1,540 $2,400 $4,000
3.5% today — current realised $1,050 $1,348 $2,100 $3,500
2.5% soft-landing base / Fed dot plot 2027 end $750 $963 $1,500 $2,500
1.5% aggressive cuts (mild recession) $450 $578 $900 $1,500
0.5% ZIRP redux $150 $193 $300 $500
Bull

$200B float × 3.5% SOFR

~$2.65B operating profit → ~$2B net income → ~10x P/E on today's market cap. ~3x stock if multiple holds.

Base

$120B float × 2.5% SOFR

~$1.0B operating profit → ~$750M net → ~43x P/E. Fair-to-rich.

Bear

$100B float × 1.5% SOFR

Net income collapses to $200-300M → 100x+ P/E. Stock cut in half. ZIRP + bad CB + bank consortium = 80%+ downside.

financial.md · §Rate Sensitivity table · macro.md scenario grid
Next: competitive landscape → Catalyst calendar → Asymmetry → ← Back to cover